Showing posts with label vietnam property. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vietnam property. Show all posts

Monday, December 10, 2012

What's a solution/strategy to prevent a famine from happening in Vietnam again?

Q. During World War 2, there was a famine in Vietnam. What's one way to help reduce the chances or prevent a famine from happening again in Vietnam and improve the quality of the environment?

A. Increased use of a form of soil called Terra Preta or biochar which can increase crop yields up to 300 percent, requires less water and fertilizers, improves poor soils, reduces the need for deforestation, sequesters carbon to mitigate global warming and retains nutrients for centuries. This type of soil was discovered in the Amazon and was developed centuries ago by the natives there to improve poor soils.

Other means could employ drought-resistant strains of rice, aquaponics methods, etc..

Terra Preta...
"or terra preta do indio, has mystified science for the last hundred years. Three times richer in nitrogen and phosphorous, and twenty times the carbon of normal soils, terra preta is the legacy of ancient Amazonians who predate Western civilization. Scientists who long debated the capacity of 'savages' to transform the virgin rainforest now agree that indigenous people transformed large regions of the Amazon into amazingly fertile black earth. The Amazonians' techniques remain an enigma but are believed to have used slash-and-smolder to lock half of the carbon in burnt vegetation into a stable form of biochar instead of releasing the bulk of it into the atmosphere like typical slash-and-burn practices.

The difference between terra preta and ordinary soils is immense. A hectare of meter-deep terra preta can contain 250 tonnes of carbon, as opposed to 100 tonnes in unimproved soils from similar parent material, according to Bruno Glaser, of the University of Bayreuth, Germany. To understand what this means, the difference in the carbon between these soils matches all of the vegetation on top of them. Furthermore, there is no clear limit to just how much biochar can be added to the soil.

Claims for biochar's capacity to capture carbon sound almost audacious. Johannes Lehmann, soil scientist and author of Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, Properties, Management, believes that a strategy combining biochar with biofuels could ultimately offset 9.5 billion tons of carbon per year-an amount equal to the total current fossil fuel emissions!"

http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/004815.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080410153658.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081217190439.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-hSl59ET2A&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGurqqGTMW4&feature=related





Rice strains and aquaponics...one local company here in town grows a million pounds of food and 10,000 fish per year from a 3 acre site using aquaponics methods....much more than a normal farm could grow
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/11/081120162847.htm

http://growingpower.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV9CCxdkOng&feature=related


Why did vietnamese emigrate to US after Vietnam war?
Q. Why did they go to the US instead of another country? They helped diem dicatorship in South Vietnam, made a mess in North Vietnam. Why after all the problems US made to Vietnam, some vietnamese can even think of emigrating in US? Dont they have any pride? Do they want to yield to America again?

A. At first, I am a Vietnamese. You should believe that my answer can give you a better understand why.

Why did Vietnamese emigrate to US after Vietnam War?
Because Vietnamese love Freedom, We have not come to the U.S for Economic.


In 1975, North Communist invaded South Vietnam in term of Liberation. In fact, as a war victory, they killed a lot of former people who�s severed for former government. A thousand of Military and soldiers -Vietnam Republican were sent to Re-education Camp where lost their life there. Vietnamese people in city were removed from their homes for North Communist Officer. Their own properties were sealed and to be taken over by local communist government. In countryside, farmer's land was controlled by Local Government.

No freedom for Vietnamese after War. All Vietnamese love Freedom but We have paid the price for it. Many Vietnamese People lost their life on the ocean. The Children lost their father and mother.

The History of Boat People is now closed, but it is still there. We never forget.


If you were married in Vietnam, can you go there to get a divorce without a signature from the spouse?
Q. I have reason to believe that my fathers young wife has gone back to Vietnam and has possibly remarried there, without our knowledge of a divorce. She apparently went there in 08 and remarried, then came back here 3 weeks later. Is it possible to obtain a divorce there without the spouses signature???

A. There are 2 sides to this story. I've seen many of these old guy/ young woman marriages fall in a heap and its always the woman at fault. To answer your question, yes, she could have come back to Vietnam and obtained a divorce, regardless of where she was married. I doubt she would have remarried here. Not in 3 weeks anyway, and certainly not to another foreigner. But here's a question. Why would she do this via the back door relinquishing her right to property settlement? Is there any property involved or was this another case of an old guy promising the world and delivering very little, on all fronts? Seen it many, many times! I've also heard the woman's side of the story many times as well and they're all similar. Old guys are exactly that, old! Throw in alcohol, and or nicotine, and or prescription medication and you've got someone in need of a nurse, not a wife! I could say plenty more but most guys will know what I'm talking about. I suggest he contact a lawyer or the Family Court in his country. They can advise him on where he stands.


If I retire and then I move to another country Will I be able to receive my social security benefits? How?
Q. I have a friend who is close to retire(he's 67) he owns a property in Costa Rica and another in Cuba, yes in Cuba. Well he was told that if he move to another country he will loss his social security benefits as well as the medicare. How true is that? There is any way to maintain those benefits at the same time he has fun out there???

A. Benefits to Cuba are out, but Costa Rica is ok...

U.S. Treasury Regulations
U.S. Treasury Department regulations prohibit sending payments to you if you are in Cuba or North Korea. If you are a U.S. citizen and are in Cuba or North Korea, you can receive all of your payments that were withheld once you leave that country and go to another country where we can send payments. Generally, if you are not a U.S. citizen, you cannot receive any payments for months in which you live in one of these countries, even though you leave that country and satisfy all other requirements.

Social Security restrictions
Social Security restrictions prohibit sending payments to individuals in Cambodia, Vietnam or areas that were in the former Soviet Union (other than Armenia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Russia). Generally, you cannot receive payments while you are in one of these countries, and we cannot send your payments to anyone for you. However, exceptions can be made for certain eligible beneficiaries in countries other than Cuba or North Korea.

To qualify for an exception, you must agree to the conditions of payment. One of the conditions is that you must appear in person at the U.S. Embassy each month to receive your benefits. Contact your nearest U. S. Social Security office or U.S. Embassy or consulate for additional information about these conditions and whether you might qualify for an exception.

If you do not qualify for payment under this procedure and you move from one of these countries to another country where we can send payments, you can receive all the benefits for which you were eligible except when you were in one of the countries listed in the section Social Security restrictions .





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sunday, December 9, 2012

How can I tell if my fiancee is using me for a green card or not ?

Q. I'm marrying a girl from vietnam because of my problems with dating, I want to know how i can tell if she's using me or not. I tell people in the real world that it's a tradition i'm following so I can cover up the real reason.

A. Even if she is, this kind of thing goes both ways...she gets the green card, you get a wife.

However, you do need to avoid a sham marriage: http://www.hooyou.com/marriage/notimmigration.html

The USCIS always takes into account the following factors while making their interpretation:

Whether the couple have known each other for a reasonably long time;

The frequency of meetings of the couple prior to the marriage;

Whether the couple have lived together in the past or presently live together;

Whether the couple married only after one party became the subject of an investigation, removal, or deportation proceedings by the USCIS. An immigration petition may not be approved for the alien who was married after the commencement of removal, exclusion, or deportation proceeding until the alien has resided outside the U.S. for at least two years, unless the alien spouse can prove the marriage was a good faith marriage and not solely for immigration purposes.

To prove the marriage was entered into in good faith, the following evidence should be presented:
...Document showing joint ownership of property;
...Joint tenancy of lease;
...Documentation showing commingling of financial resources;
...Birth certificates of children born to the couple;
...Affidavits of a third party proving there is a bona fide marital relationship between the couple; and
...Other documents to prove that the purpose of the marriage is not to evade immigration laws.

Whether a spousal immigration petition is filed by a permanent resident who has been accorded status based on a prior marriage. This kind of immigration petition would not be approved, unless the following requirements are satisfied:
...A period of 5 years has elapsed since the petitioning alien acquired his/her permanent resident status;
...The petitioning alien resident presents clear and convincing evidence that the prior marriage was not entered into for purpose of evading the immigration laws; or
...The prior marriage is terminated by the death of the spouse of the petitioning alien resident.

Whether the couple comes from diverse cultural background or speaks a common language.

There are further links on the page outlining other issues involving marriage & green cards.

As best I can tell, she should come here on a visa, not just be a "mail-order bride" in order to satisfy requirements.

Good luck to you.


The Wild West -- What are other times in history similar to the clash between order and lawlessness?
Q. The Wild West is popularly understood to have a major clash between civilization and order. The towns were wild and rowdy at first, which was both liberating and frightening. Later, there was constant tension between people who liked the freedom to do whatever they wanted (drink, gamble, womanize, etc) and those who wanted the benefits of "civilization" (safety, protection of property, etc). The result was a legendary clash that still echoes in pop culture.

What are other times in history when there was such a dramatic clash between lawlessness and law-and-order? TYIA!

A. The genocide in Rwanda in the mid 1990s
The Gold Rush
The French Revolution
The protests during the Vietnam War
Various events in the Civil Rights movement
Basically the entire 60's/70's, with the drug culture


What good are Rules of Engagement if they lose the war for you?
Q. Now we try to avoid civilian populations and such, but we should have learned from Korea and Vietnam that civilians aren't always civilians, and can be human bombs, or even carry guns. As loath as I am to say it, I think we may need to examine our Rules of Engagement. Who agrees?
Lord Britain, I understand what you're saying, and even agree in principle, but as I said before, sometimes "civilians" aren't civilians, and you have to think of your fellow servicepeople first.
and brucec, another popular saying is, "beg forgiveness, not permission.

A. You are right to a degree. The Rules of Engagement can lose the war for you and we DID see that in Vietnam, I was there and we did have targets that were a tremendous threat to our troops that we were not permitted to bomb -I saw pictures of thousands of trucks lined up on the docks in Haiphong harbor that would be used to transport men and material into South Vietnam to fight our troops and we were not allowed to bomb them. According to the ROE, Haiphong Harbor was off-limits to our Air Force. The ROE said we couldn't attack North Vietnamese aircraft on the ground, we had to wait until they were in the air! The ROE said we couldn't bomb their airports! That said, you must have ROE, Someone has to have a hand on the controls and you would hope the person with that hand knew a little about fighting a war, not like the current occupant or his buddies. Aside from the humanitarian reasons for the ROE, you have to limit the damage to innocent civilians and their property or you make more enemies than you kill. And yes, the ROE is not something etched in stone, it needs to be constantly revised, again. by someone who knows the way wars are fought, not someone in an armchair back in Washington who managed to avoid the combat zone.


How can the us government stop the merchandise which imported from another country?
Q. Right now most merchandise make from another country.such as China ,India, Mexico and Vietnam. American people do not have a job. We (American) must think about that.We should not buy every thing which make in China.The US president and government must increase really high tax for imports merchandise.

A. Look at NAFTA Data:

Canadians bought in 2009 per person from America: $5,986 USD
Americans bought in 2009 per person from Canada: $730 USD

Mexicans bought in 2009 per person from America: $1,159 USD
Americans bought in 2009 per person from Mexico: $570 USD

USA buys oil and parts (Made by Low wage jobs) and sell high end products (Made by High Salary Jobs). It looks like NAFTA is pretty good for America.

The only reason the "USA Trade Balance" is negative with these 2 countries is because USA has 3 times the population of Mexico and 10 times the population of Canada. More People buy More. Simple Math!

If you put Taxes on Canadian and Mexican Products they will do the same on American Products. One of the reasons American Products are competitive in Canada and Mexico is because of NAFTA. They will start buying European.

On the other Hand look at the China Data:

Americans bought in 2009 per person from China: $956 USD
Chinese bought in 2009 per person from America: $51 USD

Why is that? China is a closed Economy. China does not allow imports or tax them heavily. Typically companies will not risk their intellectual property by putting plants in China, but Chinese Domestic Market is so huge that they want a piece of it, so instead of making the "High End Products" in USA or Europe and exporting to China, they go and put the plant in China.

Because US Government gets Corporate Tax and borrows money from China, it let China Bully him.

But Worse!!! Look at the European Data:

European Union bought in 2009 per person from America: $440 USD
Americans bought in 2009 per person from the EU: $909 USD.

Why are we buying from Europe? Are we less educated?? Is their labor more cheap? Aren't they a socialist region? Those are "High Paying Jobs" sent to Europe! Those are the ones we need, not the ones lost to Canada and Mexico.

Hell Mexican Tourists expend more Money in USA than the Europeans...





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Friday, December 7, 2012

What good are Rules of Engagement if they lose the war for you?

Q. Now we try to avoid civilian populations and such, but we should have learned from Korea and Vietnam that civilians aren't always civilians, and can be human bombs, or even carry guns. As loath as I am to say it, I think we may need to examine our Rules of Engagement. Who agrees?
Lord Britain, I understand what you're saying, and even agree in principle, but as I said before, sometimes "civilians" aren't civilians, and you have to think of your fellow servicepeople first.
and brucec, another popular saying is, "beg forgiveness, not permission.

A. You are right to a degree. The Rules of Engagement can lose the war for you and we DID see that in Vietnam, I was there and we did have targets that were a tremendous threat to our troops that we were not permitted to bomb -I saw pictures of thousands of trucks lined up on the docks in Haiphong harbor that would be used to transport men and material into South Vietnam to fight our troops and we were not allowed to bomb them. According to the ROE, Haiphong Harbor was off-limits to our Air Force. The ROE said we couldn't attack North Vietnamese aircraft on the ground, we had to wait until they were in the air! The ROE said we couldn't bomb their airports! That said, you must have ROE, Someone has to have a hand on the controls and you would hope the person with that hand knew a little about fighting a war, not like the current occupant or his buddies. Aside from the humanitarian reasons for the ROE, you have to limit the damage to innocent civilians and their property or you make more enemies than you kill. And yes, the ROE is not something etched in stone, it needs to be constantly revised, again. by someone who knows the way wars are fought, not someone in an armchair back in Washington who managed to avoid the combat zone.


How can the us government stop the merchandise which imported from another country?
Q. Right now most merchandise make from another country.such as China ,India, Mexico and Vietnam. American people do not have a job. We (American) must think about that.We should not buy every thing which make in China.The US president and government must increase really high tax for imports merchandise.

A. Look at NAFTA Data:

Canadians bought in 2009 per person from America: $5,986 USD
Americans bought in 2009 per person from Canada: $730 USD

Mexicans bought in 2009 per person from America: $1,159 USD
Americans bought in 2009 per person from Mexico: $570 USD

USA buys oil and parts (Made by Low wage jobs) and sell high end products (Made by High Salary Jobs). It looks like NAFTA is pretty good for America.

The only reason the "USA Trade Balance" is negative with these 2 countries is because USA has 3 times the population of Mexico and 10 times the population of Canada. More People buy More. Simple Math!

If you put Taxes on Canadian and Mexican Products they will do the same on American Products. One of the reasons American Products are competitive in Canada and Mexico is because of NAFTA. They will start buying European.

On the other Hand look at the China Data:

Americans bought in 2009 per person from China: $956 USD
Chinese bought in 2009 per person from America: $51 USD

Why is that? China is a closed Economy. China does not allow imports or tax them heavily. Typically companies will not risk their intellectual property by putting plants in China, but Chinese Domestic Market is so huge that they want a piece of it, so instead of making the "High End Products" in USA or Europe and exporting to China, they go and put the plant in China.

Because US Government gets Corporate Tax and borrows money from China, it let China Bully him.

But Worse!!! Look at the European Data:

European Union bought in 2009 per person from America: $440 USD
Americans bought in 2009 per person from the EU: $909 USD.

Why are we buying from Europe? Are we less educated?? Is their labor more cheap? Aren't they a socialist region? Those are "High Paying Jobs" sent to Europe! Those are the ones we need, not the ones lost to Canada and Mexico.

Hell Mexican Tourists expend more Money in USA than the Europeans...


When a country becomes communist why would it stop exporting products?
Q. I'm writing a global paper & I need to know why a country would stop exporting. Its about the vietnam war & why one of the reasons we went to war is to keep importing of vietnam resources.

A. Our desperate need to trade with the Republic of Vietnam is one of the many myths spread by the antiwar movement over the years as one of the alternative reasons for our involvement in Vietnam. Let�s stop and think about that for a second. In the late 1950s what was the main export from South Vietnam? Oil? No�. Gold? No�. Uranium? No�. What was this strategic product so important that the United States would go to war over it�.???? It was rice.

So, by this argument we went to war in Vietnam to ensure our continued supply of rice not be cut off. Uh�. No�. In fact, the United States produced so much rice we were a major exporter of the product too. What is wrong with this picture?

Despite being in the middle of a war South Vietnam�s economy grew during the whole war. North Vietnam�s economy, on the other hand, was at best stagnant. If it had not been for the economic support (as well as the weapons they were given) it would have collapsed.

After South Vietnam was occupied the Communists started their collectivization of the South�s economy. They seized the land, they either murdered or exiled the merchant class, they imprisoned and/or murdered the intelligence, and they seized all personal property. Millions of people were imprisoned and/or forced to flee for their lives, and �boat-people� were washing up on every beach in East Asia from Japan to Australia for the better part of the next decade.

South Vietnam�s economy collapsed and for years after the Communist takeover they did not export rice, they were forced to import it because the farmers had no incentive to grow it under the government program. So much for the �worker�s paradise� theory of Communism.


How one can get compensation for the lost property in Vietnam during war?
Q. Indian
Property belongs to my grand father who is no more
documents for the property available

A. Not possible!!!!!!!!!





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

How can I tell if my fiancee is using me for a green card or not ?

Q. I'm marrying a girl from vietnam because of my problems with dating, I want to know how i can tell if she's using me or not. I tell people in the real world that it's a tradition i'm following so I can cover up the real reason.

A. Even if she is, this kind of thing goes both ways...she gets the green card, you get a wife.

However, you do need to avoid a sham marriage: http://www.hooyou.com/marriage/notimmigration.html

The USCIS always takes into account the following factors while making their interpretation:

Whether the couple have known each other for a reasonably long time;

The frequency of meetings of the couple prior to the marriage;

Whether the couple have lived together in the past or presently live together;

Whether the couple married only after one party became the subject of an investigation, removal, or deportation proceedings by the USCIS. An immigration petition may not be approved for the alien who was married after the commencement of removal, exclusion, or deportation proceeding until the alien has resided outside the U.S. for at least two years, unless the alien spouse can prove the marriage was a good faith marriage and not solely for immigration purposes.

To prove the marriage was entered into in good faith, the following evidence should be presented:
...Document showing joint ownership of property;
...Joint tenancy of lease;
...Documentation showing commingling of financial resources;
...Birth certificates of children born to the couple;
...Affidavits of a third party proving there is a bona fide marital relationship between the couple; and
...Other documents to prove that the purpose of the marriage is not to evade immigration laws.

Whether a spousal immigration petition is filed by a permanent resident who has been accorded status based on a prior marriage. This kind of immigration petition would not be approved, unless the following requirements are satisfied:
...A period of 5 years has elapsed since the petitioning alien acquired his/her permanent resident status;
...The petitioning alien resident presents clear and convincing evidence that the prior marriage was not entered into for purpose of evading the immigration laws; or
...The prior marriage is terminated by the death of the spouse of the petitioning alien resident.

Whether the couple comes from diverse cultural background or speaks a common language.

There are further links on the page outlining other issues involving marriage & green cards.

As best I can tell, she should come here on a visa, not just be a "mail-order bride" in order to satisfy requirements.

Good luck to you.


The Wild West -- What are other times in history similar to the clash between order and lawlessness?
Q. The Wild West is popularly understood to have a major clash between civilization and order. The towns were wild and rowdy at first, which was both liberating and frightening. Later, there was constant tension between people who liked the freedom to do whatever they wanted (drink, gamble, womanize, etc) and those who wanted the benefits of "civilization" (safety, protection of property, etc). The result was a legendary clash that still echoes in pop culture.

What are other times in history when there was such a dramatic clash between lawlessness and law-and-order? TYIA!

A. The genocide in Rwanda in the mid 1990s
The Gold Rush
The French Revolution
The protests during the Vietnam War
Various events in the Civil Rights movement
Basically the entire 60's/70's, with the drug culture


What good are Rules of Engagement if they lose the war for you?
Q. Now we try to avoid civilian populations and such, but we should have learned from Korea and Vietnam that civilians aren't always civilians, and can be human bombs, or even carry guns. As loath as I am to say it, I think we may need to examine our Rules of Engagement. Who agrees?
Lord Britain, I understand what you're saying, and even agree in principle, but as I said before, sometimes "civilians" aren't civilians, and you have to think of your fellow servicepeople first.
and brucec, another popular saying is, "beg forgiveness, not permission.

A. You are right to a degree. The Rules of Engagement can lose the war for you and we DID see that in Vietnam, I was there and we did have targets that were a tremendous threat to our troops that we were not permitted to bomb -I saw pictures of thousands of trucks lined up on the docks in Haiphong harbor that would be used to transport men and material into South Vietnam to fight our troops and we were not allowed to bomb them. According to the ROE, Haiphong Harbor was off-limits to our Air Force. The ROE said we couldn't attack North Vietnamese aircraft on the ground, we had to wait until they were in the air! The ROE said we couldn't bomb their airports! That said, you must have ROE, Someone has to have a hand on the controls and you would hope the person with that hand knew a little about fighting a war, not like the current occupant or his buddies. Aside from the humanitarian reasons for the ROE, you have to limit the damage to innocent civilians and their property or you make more enemies than you kill. And yes, the ROE is not something etched in stone, it needs to be constantly revised, again. by someone who knows the way wars are fought, not someone in an armchair back in Washington who managed to avoid the combat zone.


How can the us government stop the merchandise which imported from another country?
Q. Right now most merchandise make from another country.such as China ,India, Mexico and Vietnam. American people do not have a job. We (American) must think about that.We should not buy every thing which make in China.The US president and government must increase really high tax for imports merchandise.

A. Look at NAFTA Data:

Canadians bought in 2009 per person from America: $5,986 USD
Americans bought in 2009 per person from Canada: $730 USD

Mexicans bought in 2009 per person from America: $1,159 USD
Americans bought in 2009 per person from Mexico: $570 USD

USA buys oil and parts (Made by Low wage jobs) and sell high end products (Made by High Salary Jobs). It looks like NAFTA is pretty good for America.

The only reason the "USA Trade Balance" is negative with these 2 countries is because USA has 3 times the population of Mexico and 10 times the population of Canada. More People buy More. Simple Math!

If you put Taxes on Canadian and Mexican Products they will do the same on American Products. One of the reasons American Products are competitive in Canada and Mexico is because of NAFTA. They will start buying European.

On the other Hand look at the China Data:

Americans bought in 2009 per person from China: $956 USD
Chinese bought in 2009 per person from America: $51 USD

Why is that? China is a closed Economy. China does not allow imports or tax them heavily. Typically companies will not risk their intellectual property by putting plants in China, but Chinese Domestic Market is so huge that they want a piece of it, so instead of making the "High End Products" in USA or Europe and exporting to China, they go and put the plant in China.

Because US Government gets Corporate Tax and borrows money from China, it let China Bully him.

But Worse!!! Look at the European Data:

European Union bought in 2009 per person from America: $440 USD
Americans bought in 2009 per person from the EU: $909 USD.

Why are we buying from Europe? Are we less educated?? Is their labor more cheap? Aren't they a socialist region? Those are "High Paying Jobs" sent to Europe! Those are the ones we need, not the ones lost to Canada and Mexico.

Hell Mexican Tourists expend more Money in USA than the Europeans...





Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

What's a solution/strategy to prevent a famine from happening in Vietnam again?

Q. During World War 2, there was a famine in Vietnam. What's one way to help reduce the chances or prevent a famine from happening again in Vietnam and improve the quality of the environment?

A. Increased use of a form of soil called Terra Preta or biochar which can increase crop yields up to 300 percent, requires less water and fertilizers, improves poor soils, reduces the need for deforestation, sequesters carbon to mitigate global warming and retains nutrients for centuries. This type of soil was discovered in the Amazon and was developed centuries ago by the natives there to improve poor soils.

Other means could employ drought-resistant strains of rice, aquaponics methods, etc..

Terra Preta...
"or terra preta do indio, has mystified science for the last hundred years. Three times richer in nitrogen and phosphorous, and twenty times the carbon of normal soils, terra preta is the legacy of ancient Amazonians who predate Western civilization. Scientists who long debated the capacity of 'savages' to transform the virgin rainforest now agree that indigenous people transformed large regions of the Amazon into amazingly fertile black earth. The Amazonians' techniques remain an enigma but are believed to have used slash-and-smolder to lock half of the carbon in burnt vegetation into a stable form of biochar instead of releasing the bulk of it into the atmosphere like typical slash-and-burn practices.

The difference between terra preta and ordinary soils is immense. A hectare of meter-deep terra preta can contain 250 tonnes of carbon, as opposed to 100 tonnes in unimproved soils from similar parent material, according to Bruno Glaser, of the University of Bayreuth, Germany. To understand what this means, the difference in the carbon between these soils matches all of the vegetation on top of them. Furthermore, there is no clear limit to just how much biochar can be added to the soil.

Claims for biochar's capacity to capture carbon sound almost audacious. Johannes Lehmann, soil scientist and author of Amazonian Dark Earths: Origin, Properties, Management, believes that a strategy combining biochar with biofuels could ultimately offset 9.5 billion tons of carbon per year-an amount equal to the total current fossil fuel emissions!"

http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/004815.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080410153658.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081217190439.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-hSl59ET2A&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGurqqGTMW4&feature=related





Rice strains and aquaponics...one local company here in town grows a million pounds of food and 10,000 fish per year from a 3 acre site using aquaponics methods....much more than a normal farm could grow
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/11/081120162847.htm

http://growingpower.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV9CCxdkOng&feature=related


Why did vietnamese emigrate to US after Vietnam war?
Q. Why did they go to the US instead of another country? They helped diem dicatorship in South Vietnam, made a mess in North Vietnam. Why after all the problems US made to Vietnam, some vietnamese can even think of emigrating in US? Dont they have any pride? Do they want to yield to America again?

A. At first, I am a Vietnamese. You should believe that my answer can give you a better understand why.

Why did Vietnamese emigrate to US after Vietnam War?
Because Vietnamese love Freedom, We have not come to the U.S for Economic.


In 1975, North Communist invaded South Vietnam in term of Liberation. In fact, as a war victory, they killed a lot of former people who�s severed for former government. A thousand of Military and soldiers -Vietnam Republican were sent to Re-education Camp where lost their life there. Vietnamese people in city were removed from their homes for North Communist Officer. Their own properties were sealed and to be taken over by local communist government. In countryside, farmer's land was controlled by Local Government.

No freedom for Vietnamese after War. All Vietnamese love Freedom but We have paid the price for it. Many Vietnamese People lost their life on the ocean. The Children lost their father and mother.

The History of Boat People is now closed, but it is still there. We never forget.


If you were married in Vietnam, can you go there to get a divorce without a signature from the spouse?
Q. I have reason to believe that my fathers young wife has gone back to Vietnam and has possibly remarried there, without our knowledge of a divorce. She apparently went there in 08 and remarried, then came back here 3 weeks later. Is it possible to obtain a divorce there without the spouses signature???

A. There are 2 sides to this story. I've seen many of these old guy/ young woman marriages fall in a heap and its always the woman at fault. To answer your question, yes, she could have come back to Vietnam and obtained a divorce, regardless of where she was married. I doubt she would have remarried here. Not in 3 weeks anyway, and certainly not to another foreigner. But here's a question. Why would she do this via the back door relinquishing her right to property settlement? Is there any property involved or was this another case of an old guy promising the world and delivering very little, on all fronts? Seen it many, many times! I've also heard the woman's side of the story many times as well and they're all similar. Old guys are exactly that, old! Throw in alcohol, and or nicotine, and or prescription medication and you've got someone in need of a nurse, not a wife! I could say plenty more but most guys will know what I'm talking about. I suggest he contact a lawyer or the Family Court in his country. They can advise him on where he stands.


If I retire and then I move to another country Will I be able to receive my social security benefits? How?
Q. I have a friend who is close to retire(he's 67) he owns a property in Costa Rica and another in Cuba, yes in Cuba. Well he was told that if he move to another country he will loss his social security benefits as well as the medicare. How true is that? There is any way to maintain those benefits at the same time he has fun out there???

A. Benefits to Cuba are out, but Costa Rica is ok...

U.S. Treasury Regulations
U.S. Treasury Department regulations prohibit sending payments to you if you are in Cuba or North Korea. If you are a U.S. citizen and are in Cuba or North Korea, you can receive all of your payments that were withheld once you leave that country and go to another country where we can send payments. Generally, if you are not a U.S. citizen, you cannot receive any payments for months in which you live in one of these countries, even though you leave that country and satisfy all other requirements.

Social Security restrictions
Social Security restrictions prohibit sending payments to individuals in Cambodia, Vietnam or areas that were in the former Soviet Union (other than Armenia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Russia). Generally, you cannot receive payments while you are in one of these countries, and we cannot send your payments to anyone for you. However, exceptions can be made for certain eligible beneficiaries in countries other than Cuba or North Korea.

To qualify for an exception, you must agree to the conditions of payment. One of the conditions is that you must appear in person at the U.S. Embassy each month to receive your benefits. Contact your nearest U. S. Social Security office or U.S. Embassy or consulate for additional information about these conditions and whether you might qualify for an exception.

If you do not qualify for payment under this procedure and you move from one of these countries to another country where we can send payments, you can receive all the benefits for which you were eligible except when you were in one of the countries listed in the section Social Security restrictions .





Powered by Yahoo! Answers